this week i worked on the gale digital scholar lab.
i found that using it at first was more challenging than i thought it would be as it is not as straightforward as it seems. as a result, i think i would find helping someone else learn how to use it somewhat challenging, but not impossible. the analysis run portion of the training was interesting to me as i found the fact that ngrams could produce graphs based on the text to be quite useful for things like frequency counters.
i found adding content to content sets frustrating at first as there is no button next to the content itself, it is at the top of the page instead, which confused me. additionally, having to check that your file was successfully uploaded and checking the box in the successfully uploaded list seemed tedious to me as well.
i would still like to explore more analysis tools offered by the program like sentiment analysis and topic modelling, as well as learn more about how to perform an in depth text analysis.
looking at the gale research showcase i found students also took similar steps to the ones we took in the training – curation, cleaning, and analysis. looking through some of the projects made me realise that the tool could be used for other forms of analysis. i was looking at a project on Roberto Calvi’s Trial which clued me into other uses, like comparing texts in order to form a conclusion instead of just literary analysis like i initially thought. i think with time, i would be able to use the tool in different ways in order to produce various projects.
project wise, i worked on renaming and sorting image files in the project folder, it’s been taking a lot longer than i thought it would – i guess i underestimated the scope of the task.
i hope to continue my work on the project folder and work on more trainings in the coming week. additionally, fall break is coming soon and i can’t wait for some period of rest.
⋆˙⟡ steph